Passengers say they paid extra for outside views but were seated beside blank cabin walls insteadA federal judge on Monday rejected United Airlines’ bid to dismiss a lawsuit ?by passengers who complained they paid ext...
See morePassengers say they paid extra for outside views but were seated beside blank cabin walls instead
A federal judge on Monday rejected United Airlines’ bid to dismiss a lawsuit ?by passengers who complained they paid extra money to sit in window seats – only to discover their seats ?had no actual windows.
US district judge ?James Donato in San Francisco rejected United’s defense that “window” referred to the location of a seat relative to the ?cabin wall and aisle, and the carrier also contended it never contractually promised that seats in the window position would have views outside.
Continue reading...
Passengers say they paid extra for outside views but were seated beside blank cabin walls insteadA federal judge on Monday rejected United Airlines’ bid to dismiss a lawsuit ?by passengers who complained they paid ext...
See more