Prof Peter Ayton welcomes science in sporting commentary, but wants to set the record straight
While it is wonderful to see scientific theories cited in sport analysis (Guardiola ready to benefit as fellow Cruyff disciple Arteta strays from path, 17 April), Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s Nobel prize-winning paper on prospect theory did not show that “human beings suffer from loss aversion when in a favourable position”. Or that those in pursuit of the favourable position are “much more open to risk taking”.
Prospect theory predicts that people are more highly motivated to avoid losses than to achieve gains of comparable magnitude – which explains why teams facing a disappointing scoreline get more yellow and red cards and use more substitutes, why basketball teams behind by a point at half time win more often than teams ahead by a point, and why golfers hole more par putts than birdie putts at the same distance, but not why a race leader would take less risk than their pursuers.
Continue reading...
Prof Peter Ayton welcomes science in sporting commentary, but wants to set the record straightWhile it is wonderful to see scientific theories cited in sport analysis (Guardiola ready to benefit as fellow Cruyff disci...
See more
